Global Warming???

[ZOOTECH]

Vote only with a minimum of text, we already have a thread for the back and forth bickering.

[ZOOTECH]

Re: Global Warming???

Vote only with a minimum of text, we already have a thread for the back and forth bickering.

WOW, I don't know how that works, but each vote is 1000% ???

[Geo]

Re: Global Warming???

You need to add a fourth choice...."Combination... naturally occurring and man-made ( % not known)

[Copier Addict]

Re: Global Warming???

I agree with Geo. Fourth choice would give a better result

[copyman]

Re: Global Warming???

Yes. Agree with a 4th choice.

[ZOOTECH]

Re: Global Warming???

Yes. Agree with a 4th choice.

I didn't think of a 4th, or 5th choice at that time - wished I had; my vote is now the combination #4.

[slimslob]

Re: Global Warming???

I didn't think of a 4th, or 5th choice at that time - wished I had; my vote is now the combination #4.

By 5th do you mean naturally occurring if at all?

[ZOOTECH]

Re: Global Warming???

By 5th do you mean naturally occurring if at all?

No, # 1 is naturally occurring; I left #5 open for an option I hadn't though of.

[slimslob]

Re: Global Warming???

# 6 made by aliens???

Groan.jpg

[Ctl-Alt-Del]

Re: Global Warming???

You left out option D: Naturally occurring but accelerated / negatively affected by man.

Every climate science denier points to prior climate periods and says, "but there was an ice age" or "it was warmer last summer" which may be true in your area but man does affect climate change, it's pretty clear science. If you want to disagree with me you can but I don't care, I'll just stick with the opinion of 97% of the worlds scientists.

[gneebore]

Re: Global Warming???

You left out option D: Naturally occurring but accelerated / negatively affected by man.

Every climate science denier points to prior climate periods and says, "but there was an ice age" or "it was warmer last summer" which may be true in your area but man does affect climate change, it's pretty clear science. If you want to disagree with me you can but I don't care, I'll just stick with the opinion of 97% of the worlds scientists.

And here is where that 97 percent of scientist nonsense comes from:
"Lawrence Solomon, executive director of Energy Probe and author of The Deniers, carefully explainsWhy Humans Don't Have Much To Do With Climate Change

[Copier Addict]

Re: Global Warming???

And here is where that 97 percent of scientist nonsense comes from:
"Lawrence Solomon, executive director of Energy Probe and author of The Deniers, carefully explainsWhy Humans Don't Have Much To Do With Climate Change

Here is how NASA feels.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

[ZOOTECH]

Re: Global Warming???

Here is how NASA feels.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

It's already been suggested on another thread that you can't trust NASA info, because it's funded in part by the government - and the scientists just want more funding.

[Copier Addict]

Re: Global Warming???

It's already been suggested on another thread that you can't trust NASA info, because it's funded in part by the government - and the scientists just want more funding.

Yes I saw that. I laughed so hard milk came out my nose.

[gneebore]

Re: Global Warming???

It's already been suggested on another thread that you can't trust NASA info, because it's funded in part by the government - and the scientists just want more funding.

Actually having read several articles reporting and debunking the NASA faked data I tend to agree the report was not deliberately faking data. There is a study of the public data available that shows the data was manipulated.
NASA Exposed in 'Massive' New Climate Data Fraud | Principia Scientific International