Facebook goes full ELON

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyCarpenter
    Field Supervisor

    Site Contributor
    VIP Subscriber
    10,000+ Posts
    • Aug 2020
    • 16308

    #31
    Originally posted by Copier Addict

    Uh huh.

    Hahaha. Trying to follow your thinking process is like trying to nail jello to a tree.

    You're all over the place, son.
    Let me give you another perspective from an uber liberal


    LA Times owner says endorsing Karen Bass was a ‘mistake' due to incompetence

    Los Angeles Times Owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong is turning down the Bass.

    Dr. Soon-Shiong called his paper’s endorsement of embattled Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass a "mistake" during an appearance on the "2 Way" podcast Monday. The LA Times endorsed Bass during the 2022 mayor election.

    "At the LA Times we endorsed Karen Bass, I think right now that’s a mistake, and we admit that," Soon-Shiong said.​

    Bass has been the subject of intense scrutiny after devastating wildfires broke out in her city, burning down over 40,000 acres and killing 24 people. The mayor was criticized for initially being AWOL from the state when the blaze broke out -- she was in Ghana attending the inauguration of the country’s president.

    When Bass finally arrived back in the city, she received more backlash by refusing to answer questions from Sky News reporter Andrew Blevins, and delivering a bewildered press conference performance that increased doubts about her ability to lead during the crisis.

    "Emergency information, resources and shelter is available. All of this can be found at URL," the mayor said in a widely-ridiculed message to the public.

    A Change.org petition to recall Bass and slamming her as "grossly incompetent" has amassed over 123,000 signatures.​

    "Water supplies have been severely strained, billions of taxpayer dollars have been misallocated or left unaccounted for, and countless lives have been lost," the petition said.

    ​"Competence matters," Soon-Shiong told the podcast, which is hosted by veteran political reporter Mark Halperin.

    "We should think about how we actually elect people, on the basis of did they actually run a job did they actually make a payroll. Rather than having political politicians whose only job is to run for office," Soon-Shiong said, reiterating past criticisms he leveled at California’s political establishment in the wake of the deadly wildfires.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    "You really need people to understand how it affects the man in the street. President Trump in this election has understood that. The Republican party has become the Democratic Party in terms of addressing the problems of the man on the street," the LA Times owner said.​
    Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

    Comment

    • BillyCarpenter
      Field Supervisor

      Site Contributor
      VIP Subscriber
      10,000+ Posts
      • Aug 2020
      • 16308

      #32
      ....


      image.png
      Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

      Comment

      • BillyCarpenter
        Field Supervisor

        Site Contributor
        VIP Subscriber
        10,000+ Posts
        • Aug 2020
        • 16308

        #33
        “The real question is not which policy sounds more plausible, or which would work best if people behaved ideally, but which policy in fact turns out to produce better results with actual people, behaving as they actually do.”

        — Thomas Sowell
        Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

        Comment

        • copyman
          Owner / Technician

          Site Contributor
          2,500+ Posts
          • Sep 2005
          • 4607

          #34
          Back to original post, it's obvious the Zuck will change his policies for what ever party is in power. I don't trust him at all!

          Comment

          • Mako
            Senior Tech

            500+ Posts
            • Jan 2025
            • 533

            #35
            Originally posted by copyman
            Back to original post, it's obvious the Zuck will change his policies for what ever party is in power. I don't trust him at all!
            If Kamala had won, Zuck would still be censoring. People are thinking of this all wrong. He's removing the censorship now as a means to open the floodgates to criticism and conspiracy theories about Trump for the next four years on his platform.

            Comment

            • copyman
              Owner / Technician

              Site Contributor
              2,500+ Posts
              • Sep 2005
              • 4607

              #36
              Originally posted by Mako

              If Kamala had won, Zuck would still be censoring. People are thinking of this all wrong. He's removing the censorship now as a means to open the floodgates to criticism and conspiracy theories about Trump for the next four years on his platform.
              You may be right but at least people will me able to respond or even Trump can at least defend himslf without being censored.

              Comment

              • slimslob
                Retired

                Site Contributor
                25,000+ Posts
                • May 2013
                • 37243

                #37
                Originally posted by Mako

                If Kamala had won, Zuck would still be censoring. People are thinking of this all wrong. He's removing the censorship now as a means to open the floodgates to criticism and conspiracy theories about Trump for the next four years on his platform.
                I will believe that he has stopped censoring if and when it actually happens. I am still seeing at least one post that I have shared a day being stepped on by a Fact-Checker.

                Comment

                • Copier Addict
                  Aging Tech

                  Site Contributor
                  10,000+ Posts
                  • Jul 2013
                  • 14484

                  #38
                  Originally posted by slimslob

                  I will believe that he has stopped censoring if and when it actually happens. I am still seeing at least one post that I have shared a day being stepped on by a Fact-Checker.
                  Then maybe you should be more conscious of posting facts and not feelings.

                  Comment

                  • BillyCarpenter
                    Field Supervisor

                    Site Contributor
                    VIP Subscriber
                    10,000+ Posts
                    • Aug 2020
                    • 16308

                    #39
                    Whether Zuck follows through on his promises or not, his statements alone are golden. He ratted out Biden and admitted the fact checkers got it wrong. He is now hated by liberals. That means he's doing something right.
                    Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.

                    Comment

                    Working...