I rarely need manuals in the field. Here's why
1. Reoccurring issues.
The one blessing of a copier tech. We've seen the exact problem before, we fix it, case closed.
2. Obvious issues
Nothing new here. Copies smudge and ghost. Fuser is shot. Ok replace fuser.
3. Service mode clues.
Failure code C-123? No idea what it is? Go into service mode, pull up a counter of service codes. There it is a with a written description... C-123=Main Motor.
4. Annoying suggestions.
Example: Transport Jam. Manual says "Replace transport motor, or transport clutch, or transport sensor, or main board. No shit, notice they will never say one-way gear or worn bushings or unseated spring, etc. Yea, yea, yea I know manuals aren't written for every variable, hence why I'm writing this.
4. Knowledge Bases. For example Konica has a Knowledge Base. Contrary to reason #3. Knowledge bases give you the real answer based on Konica techs contributions. This is always checked first.
5. Memorizing part numbers or keeping a go-to list of common part numbers.
6. I believe service manuals are biased. The manufacturer doesn't want to reveal their flaws. They will never update them with REAL WORLD solutions.
I am the first to tell a lazy tech to RTFM, but as an experienced tech I find myself looking elsewhere.
(by the way this doesn't include theory manuals, which are actually useful)
1. Reoccurring issues.
The one blessing of a copier tech. We've seen the exact problem before, we fix it, case closed.
2. Obvious issues
Nothing new here. Copies smudge and ghost. Fuser is shot. Ok replace fuser.
3. Service mode clues.
Failure code C-123? No idea what it is? Go into service mode, pull up a counter of service codes. There it is a with a written description... C-123=Main Motor.
4. Annoying suggestions.
Example: Transport Jam. Manual says "Replace transport motor, or transport clutch, or transport sensor, or main board. No shit, notice they will never say one-way gear or worn bushings or unseated spring, etc. Yea, yea, yea I know manuals aren't written for every variable, hence why I'm writing this.
4. Knowledge Bases. For example Konica has a Knowledge Base. Contrary to reason #3. Knowledge bases give you the real answer based on Konica techs contributions. This is always checked first.
5. Memorizing part numbers or keeping a go-to list of common part numbers.
6. I believe service manuals are biased. The manufacturer doesn't want to reveal their flaws. They will never update them with REAL WORLD solutions.
I am the first to tell a lazy tech to RTFM, but as an experienced tech I find myself looking elsewhere.
(by the way this doesn't include theory manuals, which are actually useful)
Comment