Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fbkhan3
    Trusted Tech

    250+ Posts
    • May 2012
    • 421

    Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

    Hi everyone,
    Hope you doing very well.

    We recently installed slnx v3 for one of our client, it takes too long to get the files in scan folder. To get the files in pdf format workflow is as ""pdf converter- scan to folder ". 6mb file would take almost 6 minutes and as the size of the file increases it adds more delay.
    It is also tested from different devices and models , MP 6055,5055, IMC 3000, MP 6503 with same results.

    Native scanning works very well to the same location without any delay.

    Need ideas.

    Regards
  • KenB
    Geek Extraordinaire

    2,500+ Posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 3946

    #2
    Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

    Which version of SLNX 3 are you running?

    There have been several updates for it.
    “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

    Comment

    • fbkhan3
      Trusted Tech

      250+ Posts
      • May 2012
      • 421

      #3
      Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

      Originally posted by KenB
      Which version of SLNX 3 are you running?

      There have been several updates for it.
      It's 3.3.2.200

      Has this been the case with few versions of the software?

      Regards

      Comment

      • KenB
        Geek Extraordinaire

        2,500+ Posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 3946

        #4
        Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

        Not that I'm aware of.

        I don't see a patch for that version (other than upgrading to 3.4.1)

        Is all the firmware including the SOP panel and java (where applicable) up to the required versions?

        Do you get the same result if using SLNX to scan to email?

        Make sure the DS has the network side configured properly. There could be a DNS issue which will make you crazy until found.

        Lots of other possibilities, too, such as is there a NAS or other storage media involved? NASes can open up an entirely different can-o-worms.
        “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

        Comment

        • KenB
          Geek Extraordinaire

          2,500+ Posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 3946

          #5
          Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

          Just thought of this...What version of the client is running on the MFPs?

          A mismatch will cause all kinds of issues.
          “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

          Comment

          • fbkhan3
            Trusted Tech

            250+ Posts
            • May 2012
            • 421

            #6
            Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

            Originally posted by KenB
            Not that I'm aware of.

            I don't see a patch for that version (other than upgrading to 3.4.1)

            Is all the firmware including the SOP panel and java (where applicable) up to the required versions?

            Do you get the same result if using SLNX to scan to email?

            Make sure the DS has the network side configured properly. There could be a DNS issue which will make you crazy until found.

            Lots of other possibilities, too, such as is there a NAS or other storage media involved? NASes can open up an entirely different can-o-worms.
            All the firmwares on the devices are updated to latest including SOP & Java,

            We didn't check this large files as Scan to email, size in kB works without any delays.

            NAS and user home directory both checked to rule out the NAS issues, native scan also works perfectly to both locations.

            firewalls are off .

            completely lost.

            Regards

            Comment

            • fbkhan3
              Trusted Tech

              250+ Posts
              • May 2012
              • 421

              #7
              Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

              Originally posted by KenB
              Just thought of this...What version of the client is running on the MFPs?

              A mismatch will cause all kinds of issues.
              I will check the version of embedded app and repost.


              Regards

              Comment

              • KenB
                Geek Extraordinaire

                2,500+ Posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 3946

                #8
                Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                Originally posted by fbkhan3
                All the firmwares on the devices are updated to latest including SOP & Java,

                We didn't check this large files as Scan to email, size in kB works without any delays.

                NAS and user home directory both checked to rule out the NAS issues, native scan also works perfectly to both locations.

                firewalls are off .

                completely lost.

                Regards
                I once had a customer with SLNX 2.3 (I think) who had the same slowness issue, and they were using a NAS. Onboard scanning was cool.

                Turned out to be that the NAS had some problems with SMB1 versus SMB2/3, and the SLNX server had a problem with it.

                An update to the NAS resolved the problem.
                “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

                Comment

                • KenB
                  Geek Extraordinaire

                  2,500+ Posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 3946

                  #9
                  Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                  Just for laughs, set up a hot folder using the same workflow as the one with the issue.

                  The flow will be the same, except that the MFPs and their connections will be bypassed. The flow would come straight from the DS.

                  if it's fast, the problem lies with the MFPs or their software. If it's the same, the problem lies between the DS server and the storage destination.
                  “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

                  Comment

                  • fbkhan3
                    Trusted Tech

                    250+ Posts
                    • May 2012
                    • 421

                    #10
                    Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                    Originally posted by KenB
                    Just for laughs, set up a hot folder using the same workflow as the one with the issue.

                    The flow will be the same, except that the MFPs and their connections will be bypassed. The flow would come straight from the DS.

                    if it's fast, the problem lies with the MFPs or their software. If it's the same, the problem lies between the DS server and the storage destination.



                    Actually when converting to PDF it all gets messy, if we select the profile (workflow) on machine it makes it bit faster but the size of the file goes large, and if we keep the profile on server then size of the file reduces but it makes it so slow. clueless at the moment.

                    Regard's

                    Comment

                    • KenB
                      Geek Extraordinaire

                      2,500+ Posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 3946

                      #11
                      Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                      Originally posted by fbkhan3
                      Actually when converting to PDF it all gets messy, if we select the profile (workflow) on machine it makes it bit faster but the size of the file goes large, and if we keep the profile on server then size of the file reduces but it makes it so slow. clueless at the moment.

                      Regard's
                      Could you send me some screenshots of the profile?

                      PM me if you prefer.
                      “I think you should treat good friends like a fine wine. That’s why I keep mine locked up in the basement.” - Tim Hawkins

                      Comment

                      • fbkhan3
                        Trusted Tech

                        250+ Posts
                        • May 2012
                        • 421

                        #12
                        Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                        Originally posted by KenB
                        Could you send me some screenshots of the profile?

                        PM me if you prefer.
                        Sure, I will try to get to remote tomorrow and get the screenshots and PM you, but here is the finding that we had today.

                        1:Native device scan( B&W; Text and line, 300dpi ) file size 14mb /time 3 mints
                        2:NO pdf converter ( B&W; Text and line, 300dpi ) file size 15.2 mb /time 1.12 mints (fault causes TIFF)
                        3: With pdf convertor ( B&W; Text and line, 300dpi ) file size 16 mb /time 3 mints profile processing on device
                        4: With pdf convertor ( B&W; Text and line, 300dpi ) file size 6.5 mb /time 8 mints profile processing on server.



                        Time duration with different profiles and size of the file 72 pages in all cases. file processed on the server has the correct size but time it takes is too long.

                        Regard's
                        Last edited by fbkhan3; 06-14-2021, 03:06 PM. Reason: correction

                        Comment

                        • fbkhan3
                          Trusted Tech

                          250+ Posts
                          • May 2012
                          • 421

                          #13
                          Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                          hi folks,

                          This issue has been solved, Ricoh Recommend to do Profile tuning which is actually to increase the threads for scanning, it didn't solved the issue at first but somehow restarting the main server did the trick and scanning works perfectly fine now.


                          The tuning process is also available in Documentation.

                          Thanks for all your valuable inputs.


                          Regard's

                          Comment

                          • slimslob
                            Retired

                            Site Contributor
                            25,000+ Posts
                            • May 2013
                            • 35063

                            #14
                            Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                            Originally posted by fbkhan3
                            hi folks,

                            This issue has been solved, Ricoh Recommend to do Profile tuning which is actually to increase the threads for scanning, it didn't solved the issue at first but somehow restarting the main server did the trick and scanning works perfectly fine now.


                            The tuning process is also available in Documentation.

                            Thanks for all your valuable inputs.


                            Regard's
                            Every time I have ever modified a server profile to increase the number of simultaneous threads it required a reboot in order for the changes to take effect.

                            Comment

                            • fbkhan3
                              Trusted Tech

                              250+ Posts
                              • May 2012
                              • 421

                              #15
                              Re: Slnx v3 ,scan to folder issue,

                              SLNX is running on VM which we restarted after every adjustment and change, but i guess changes took effect after restarting the Main.(that was only possible on weekends). as this was production environment.

                              Regard's

                              Comment

                              Working...