Canon IR 105+ Printing in Duplex slowly

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tinnyjay
    Senior Tech

    500+ Posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 655

    #1

    Canon IR 105+ Printing in Duplex slowly

    I have a Canon Ir 105+ and when i print in duplex,it prints very slowly.
    Somebody helps me please?
    "Who loves the roses,must also bear thumbs"
  • teckat
    Field Supervisor

    Site Contributor
    10,000+ Posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 16083

    #2
    Originally posted by tinnyjay
    I have a Canon Ir 105+ and when i print in duplex,it prints very slowly.
    Somebody helps me please?


    make sure u have at least v12.08 / it address that issue of process speed for two-sided printing.

    is it while using DADF for scans or thru Network operations ???
    **Knowledge is time consuming, exhausting and costly for a trained Tech.**

    Comment

    • davidj7
      Service Manager

      Site Contributor
      1,000+ Posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 1107

      #3
      adding to teckat's

      define slow please . you get 50 sheets A4 in 1 min etc..
      a machine is only as good as your tech : source:screwtape ; the scary one

      Comment

      • tinnyjay
        Senior Tech

        500+ Posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 655

        #4
        It prints 3-4 A4 and looks like it stops and starts again.Maybe it prints 20-30 duplexed papers in a minute and is to much slower than Toshiba e-studio 550(55 ppm).
        "Who loves the roses,must also bear thumbs"

        Comment

        • tinnyjay
          Senior Tech

          500+ Posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 655

          #5
          Originally posted by teckat


          make sure u have at least v12.08 / it address that issue of process speed for two-sided printing.

          is it while using DADF for scans or thru Network operations ???
          It happens when i print from computer using network connections.
          My IR 105 has also usb printing options!
          Maybe is better if i use that port and not network controller?
          "Who loves the roses,must also bear thumbs"

          Comment

          • livancicm
            Technician

            50+ Posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 96

            #6
            ps driver

            update ps driver to latest

            Comment

            • SCREWTAPE
              East Coast Imaging

              Site Contributor
              2,500+ Posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 3396

              #7
              Originally posted by livancicm
              update ps driver to latest
              If they are PDF files, then yes , try using a post script driver if your not using one.
              PDF's have a history of printing slow as well.

              Comment

              • davidj7
                Service Manager

                Site Contributor
                1,000+ Posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 1107

                #8
                try printing 2 copies of the same file and see if the 2nd copy is running at the same speed as 1st or fatser
                a machine is only as good as your tech : source:screwtape ; the scary one

                Comment

                • D_L_P
                  Self Employed

                  1,000+ Posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 1196

                  #9
                  Originally posted by teckat
                  make sure u have at least v12.08 / it address that issue of process speed for two-sided printing.
                  I'd give that a try before I'd mess with usb, which is slower. There are several things to try for printing slow, but since there is a firmware update addressing specifically duplex I'd try that 1st.

                  Are you a tech or end user?
                  Does this have the Fiery controller or the built in Canon controller? We had one it turned out to be the Fiery was not compatible with their DOS programs.

                  For slow printing in general, not just duplex.
                  At Copier:
                  Turn on print after completing RIP
                  Turn off spooler

                  At Copmuter:
                  Try different driver
                  Change from immediate to Start printing after last page is spooled
                  Try Print directly to printer
                  Make true LPR port or switch to RAW port 9100 or turn off LPR byte counting
                  Don't use print server, print local

                  There's more but I think the newer version is your best bet.

                  Comment

                  • tinnyjay
                    Senior Tech

                    500+ Posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 655

                    #10
                    My IR 105+ has a integrated controller and not a Fiery like my CLC3200.
                    I am using PCL6 drivers and not PS drivers.
                    Now i will install latest PS drivers to see what happens !!!!
                    "Who loves the roses,must also bear thumbs"

                    Comment

                    • tinnyjay
                      Senior Tech

                      500+ Posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 655

                      #11
                      I tried to use PS driver and its terribly slow.
                      I see only "Waiting to print" on monitor and a printed page ones in a minute.
                      "Who loves the roses,must also bear thumbs"

                      Comment

                      • teckat
                        Field Supervisor

                        Site Contributor
                        10,000+ Posts
                        • Jan 2010
                        • 16083

                        #12
                        Originally posted by tinnyjay
                        I tried to use PS driver and its terribly slow.
                        I see only "Waiting to print" on monitor and a printed page ones in a minute.

                        did u check your 105+ firmware version like I posted earlier ????

                        v12.08
                        /
                        ****addresses Modification to correct the
                        processing speed on the
                        imageRUNNER 105+/9070 when
                        Booklet and 2-Sided print settings are
                        specified


                        ****
                        When Booklet and 2-Sided print settings are specified, copy processing
                        speed of imageRUNNER 105+/9070 are slower than imageRUNNER
                        105/8500. This speed is improved (to be the same speed as
                        imageRUNNER 105/8500).
                        **Knowledge is time consuming, exhausting and costly for a trained Tech.**

                        Comment

                        • D_L_P
                          Self Employed

                          1,000+ Posts
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 1196

                          #13
                          PCL5e is way better than PCL6. I tell my customers to only print with PCL6 if they have a specific application that needs it.

                          Again, I think the firmware update will be your solution.

                          Comment

                          • Canuck
                            Tech Specialist

                            1,000+ Posts
                            • Nov 2007
                            • 1713

                            #14
                            Uncheck the collate box in the print window.. see if it runs faster

                            Comment

                            • teckat
                              Field Supervisor

                              Site Contributor
                              10,000+ Posts
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 16083

                              #15
                              tinnyjay/ is MIA
                              **Knowledge is time consuming, exhausting and costly for a trained Tech.**

                              Comment

                              Working...