Before i run the test i prepare the machine as followed:
Check the maintenance counters to see if machine is decent.
Check the raw output with PG1, 4 and 10.
Clean the lasers windows with a stick
Clean developers in service mode
Clean inside machine from maintenance menu.
Full adjust on normal and heavy paper.
Now machine is ready for optimal performance.
I use decent paper Nuesidler/Mondi Color copy, CLC Hi grade, Xerox Colotech, 4cc. I believe the first 3 are the same product actually. 100, 160 and 200grms.
I try to print some photo's i made with a Canon Dslr, photo's i pick are taken with good exposure and maximum focus.
Machines i tried: IRC3220, CLC2620, IRC4580, CLC4040, IRC2380, IRC2880, IRC1021. MP540 (yes a Pixma, ink based)
Drivers are UFR and PS3.
Output on above machine vary from punch, grain and resolution. But colors are pretty accurate or at least "neutral" tone. Where the 1021 and 4040 where the nicest overall and the 3220 had most neutral tone and "headroom"
Now comes the new contender IR Advance C50xx, i tried several once 5030, 5035 and a 5051. New or in working order. All with newest ITB.
I tried all drivers, with all color and profile settings. Quality settings, Color settings and even several SM settings about image processing. ARCDAT on and Off.
I print from Windows photo print wizzard, Gimp, Photoshop and direct from Adv Space or network share.
Anyhow the same result: colors are way too saturated, or faces to dark. Am i the only one or does somebody have the same experience?
Playing the several settings and scanning test prints i suspect there is a problem where PDL image processing sends it's signal the main image processings stream. And PDL image processing is using a wrong Gamma, maybe 1.8 or 2.2 where the main process was expecting 1.4. To bad this isn;t very documented in Service Manual.
Check the maintenance counters to see if machine is decent.
Check the raw output with PG1, 4 and 10.
Clean the lasers windows with a stick
Clean developers in service mode
Clean inside machine from maintenance menu.
Full adjust on normal and heavy paper.
Now machine is ready for optimal performance.
I use decent paper Nuesidler/Mondi Color copy, CLC Hi grade, Xerox Colotech, 4cc. I believe the first 3 are the same product actually. 100, 160 and 200grms.
I try to print some photo's i made with a Canon Dslr, photo's i pick are taken with good exposure and maximum focus.
Machines i tried: IRC3220, CLC2620, IRC4580, CLC4040, IRC2380, IRC2880, IRC1021. MP540 (yes a Pixma, ink based)
Drivers are UFR and PS3.
Output on above machine vary from punch, grain and resolution. But colors are pretty accurate or at least "neutral" tone. Where the 1021 and 4040 where the nicest overall and the 3220 had most neutral tone and "headroom"
Now comes the new contender IR Advance C50xx, i tried several once 5030, 5035 and a 5051. New or in working order. All with newest ITB.
I tried all drivers, with all color and profile settings. Quality settings, Color settings and even several SM settings about image processing. ARCDAT on and Off.
I print from Windows photo print wizzard, Gimp, Photoshop and direct from Adv Space or network share.
Anyhow the same result: colors are way too saturated, or faces to dark. Am i the only one or does somebody have the same experience?
Playing the several settings and scanning test prints i suspect there is a problem where PDL image processing sends it's signal the main image processings stream. And PDL image processing is using a wrong Gamma, maybe 1.8 or 2.2 where the main process was expecting 1.4. To bad this isn;t very documented in Service Manual.
Comment