If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Re: How do you rank Canon, Xerox, Ricoh and Konica?
Canon machines for the most part have good built quality and the software eco system is very mature and stable (everything just works).
Print quality is solid and consistent, most parts easily surpass their rated yields and they are pretty easy machines to work on and service.
Also Sharp is quite good as well, they do use a lot more plastic and thinner sheet metal so build quality is lighter and cheaper, but they seam to run pretty well never the less.
It pains me to say it but Ricoh have gone down hill since switching to Android panels, so many software bugs and integration problems, build quality isn't great, lot of parts easily break, prematurely wear and have problems reaching yield.
Knowledge not shared, is eventually knowledge that becomes lost... like tears in the rain.
Fully qualified technician for Ricoh - Canon - Sharp - HP - Brother
Re: How do you rank Canon, Xerox, Ricoh and Konica?
Originally posted by campy
I've been servicing copiers since 1973 when everything was liquid toner. I have worked on Canon,Mita,Minolta,Ricoh,Sharp etc and they all have made a very good copier as well as a bad one. To me nothing comes close to Canon for black and white for quality of the image, they have smooth edges of the letters have excellent half tones. Canon invented and manufactures the all in one cartridge system that HP uses and has been the standard for over 30 years for black and white print quality.
The only wet process plain paper machines I remember seeing was Savin and Saxon. Yes I have lived a sheltered life.
Comment