Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lanierboy
    replied
    Re: Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    I would recommend that you change the paper feed drive assby as a complete unit.

    Leave a comment:


  • avio2
    replied
    Re: Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    Originally posted by figaro
    on inspection the clutch looks Ok...maybe we replace it with a new one and see.
    will get back to you on this.
    registration clutch

    Leave a comment:


  • figaro
    replied
    Re: Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    Originally posted by Tonerkiller
    The feed clutch may be bad.
    on inspection the clutch looks Ok...maybe we replace it with a new one and see.
    will get back to you on this.

    Leave a comment:


  • figaro
    replied
    Re: Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    Originally posted by pascalb.
    Hi ,
    - Does it work on cassette 2 in A4?
    - Have you tested with another paper?
    sometimes the paper is badly cut and takes several sheets.
    I have already met him.
    Kind regards
    Cassette 2 works 100%.
    We tried different paper with the same results.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tonerkiller
    replied
    Re: Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    The feed clutch may be bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • pascalb.
    replied
    Re: Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    Hi ,
    - Does it work on cassette 2 in A4?
    - Have you tested with another paper?
    sometimes the paper is badly cut and takes several sheets.
    I have already met him.
    Kind regards

    Leave a comment:


  • figaro
    started a topic [Jamming] Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    Utax 2506ci jam code 0511

    Hi,

    Anybody had any success in resolving this jam 0511 code issue on cassette 1

    We have swapped primary feed units around, no luck.

    Did the necessary as per bulletin TB-48B and the machine was working for a few days.

    Did simulation 031, 032, 033 and tests were ok.

    Firmware is the latest.

    Reset machine 021 and 906 and no difference.

    Anything that we overlooking?
Working...