Thinking of picking a couple of these up on service, are they a good box or not ?
-
-
Re: How good or bad are MX-4501N ?
Hi
good boxes maintane them propertly
and they run very well
cheers
-
Re: How good or bad are MX-4501N ?
We like them! Only have a few but they stand up well.
BilComment
-
Re: How good or bad are MX-4501N ?
They were galaxies better than the Bear & Apyllon predecessors. =^..^=If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.
blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=Comment
-
All sharp A3 color mx series awesome
Comment
-
Re: How good or bad are MX-4501N ?
Color not nearly as consistent or accurate as Konica Minolta technology. Not recommended if customer is printing dense, full color images - fuser jams, they run very dirty, toner is expensive and small yield (15K vs. bizhub C451 toners which are 27K - prices are nearly the same, in fact, we can buy the C451 toner for less). Canon & Ricoh boxes are also probably a bit better than Sharp. It is "Corporate Color" as others have said - so don't expect fabulous accuracy, gradations, and lack of pixelation on fine, half-toned images. For my money, Xerox and Konica Minolta stand atop the heap of manufacturers, with everybody else looking up at them.Comment
-
Re: How good or bad are MX-4501N ?
great machines, easy to work on, great color copies (not photo quaility,but really good) keep maintained and calibrated (long calibration procedure)Comment
Comment