Xerox Altalink C8030/8055 NVM, Searchlite etc

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • copytechman
    Senior Tech

    Site Contributor
    500+ Posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 915
    #1

    Xerox Altalink C8030/8055 NVM, Searchlite etc

    Looking for an nvm setting that impacts the use/enablement of the integrated finisher. I can't seem to find it in my edoc or pdf and can't get searchlite to work with edge. Does anyone know what nvm setting it was or how to make searchlite work properly with the edge browser? I havent seen any newer docs that explain on the gsn how to get searchlite working again!

    Thanks Kindly!
    A.
    Tags: edge, nvm, setting, work
    • hnami
      service technician

      100+ Posts
      • Nov 2023
      • 154
      #2
      Re: Xerox Altalink C8030/8055 NVM, Searchlite etc

      Originally posted by copytechman
      Looking for an nvm setting that impacts the use/enablement of the integrated finisher. I can't seem to find it in my edoc or pdf and can't get searchlite to work with edge. Does anyone know what nvm setting it was or how to make searchlite work properly with the edge browser? I havent seen any newer docs that explain on the gsn how to get searchlite working again!

      Thanks Kindly!
      A.

        Comment

        • adriansto
          Service Manager

          Site Contributor
          VIP Subscriber
          1,000+ Posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 2325
          #3
          Re: Xerox Altalink C8030/8055 NVM, Searchlite etc

          Originally posted by copytechman
          Looking for an nvm setting that impacts the use/enablement of the integrated finisher. I can't seem to find it in my edoc or pdf and can't get searchlite to work with edge. Does anyone know what nvm setting it was or how to make searchlite work properly with the edge browser? I havent seen any newer docs that explain on the gsn how to get searchlite working again!

          Thanks Kindly!
          A.
          742-869 = 0

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...