Duplicators vs. MFP's?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RaveDave
    • Dec 2024

    Duplicators vs. MFP's?

    I know back in the day Duplicators had their niche, but what is the benefit today with scan once print many MFP's?
  • jermyth
    Riso dude

    250+ Posts
    • Mar 2011
    • 431

    #2
    Re: Duplicators vs. MFP's?

    RISO units can print large numbers at a fraction of the cost of a mfp. Also print on various card stocks and envelopes that many mfps struggle with.

    Cheers

    Comment

    • slimslob
      Retired

      Site Contributor
      25,000+ Posts
      • May 2013
      • 35057

      #3
      Re: Duplicators vs. MFP's?

      Generally speaking the cost per page for an MFP is fairly constant. The average cost per page for a duplicator is based on ink which can vary based on coverage and cost of the masters, the more images you get per master, the lower the cost per page. There is a pages per job count where more than that count the duplicator is less expensive to use. Below that count the MFP is the better choice.

      Comment

      • Woxner
        Senior Tech

        500+ Posts
        • Jul 2011
        • 808

        #4
        Re: Duplicators vs. MFP's?

        copy quility is night and day. MFP's are very cheap on cost. plus you get tons more options on mfp.

        Comment

        • allan
          RTFM!!

          5,000+ Posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 5445

          #5
          Re: Duplicators vs. MFP's?

          You need to print at least 50 pages per master. Its fast and cheap and very reliable vs a MFP. No sort staple or duplex that makes the labor add to the cost.
          High volume MFP with sort and staple 65ppm machine or faster...

          a Riso machine is a fraction of the cost but the print cost and labor combined makes a copier an affordable luxury.

          For schools and flier spammers.
          Whatever

          Comment

          • Iowatech
            Not a service manager

            2,500+ Posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 3933

            #6
            Re: Duplicators vs. MFP's?

            Originally posted by allan
            You need to print at least 50 pages per master. Its fast and cheap and very reliable vs a MFP. No sort staple or duplex that makes the labor add to the cost.
            High volume MFP with sort and staple 65ppm machine or faster...

            a Riso machine is a fraction of the cost but the print cost and labor combined makes a copier an affordable luxury.

            For schools and flier spammers.
            Actually, there was a sort option for Risos back in the day.
            Last edited by Iowatech; 07-19-2018, 02:25 AM. Reason: TMI

            Comment

            • slimslob
              Retired

              Site Contributor
              25,000+ Posts
              • May 2013
              • 35057

              #7
              Re: Duplicators vs. MFP's?

              Originally posted by allan
              You need to print at least 50 pages per master. Its fast and cheap and very reliable vs a MFP. No sort staple or duplex that makes the labor add to the cost.
              High volume MFP with sort and staple 65ppm machine or faster...

              a Riso machine is a fraction of the cost but the print cost and labor combined makes a copier an affordable luxury.

              For schools and flier spammers.
              Ricoh did sell a duplex model at one time. It could duplex 8 1\2 X 11 LEF utilizing an 11X17 master. It worked but the Duplex unit, which was under the drum could become a mechanical nightmare.

              Comment

              Working...