KM 6030 (utax cd1060) C4200 code

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • aabarnes1
    Senior Tech
    • Mar 2009
    • 620
    #1

    KM 6030 (utax cd1060) C4200 code

    I have an error code 4200,I,ve tried the ferrite core, replaced the laser, main board and motor(driver) board to no avail. machine powers on to 'ready to copy' state, does one copy then up comes this error code, any ideas would be greatly appreciated. There is 650k only on this box and it had a full pm kit at 495k.Thanks.
    Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.
    Tags: 142, 220, 422, 486, 6030, bulletin, c4200, cd1060, code, ess, european, existing, harness, laser, one, one copy, tech, technical, transfer, transfer unit, unit, utax, wire, wired
    • Craigdumass
      Technician

      50+ Posts
      • Jun 2009
      • 61
      #2
      There is a problem with the way the wire harness is wired you should call your technical representive because I am not sure if you have to order a new harness or just have to reroute the existing one.

        Comment

        • JSC
          Gimp

          500+ Posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 618
          #3
          Craigdumass is correct, I had the same thing. I rerouted the the control wiring harness to the laser and have not had a problem since.
          The gene pool could use a little chlorine.

            Comment

            • blackcat4866
              Master Of The Obvious

              Site Contributor
              10,000+ Posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 22989
              #4
              What firmware level are you at? There were 3 or 4 consecutive firmware releases that generated 4200 codes spontaneously starting with v. 352. The last two releases seem to be clear of obvious bugs (most recently 8-11-09). At least none have come up yet. =^..^=
              If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
              1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
              2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
              3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
              4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
              5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

              blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

                Comment

                • B0265
                  Senior Tech

                  500+ Posts
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 718
                  #5
                  Originally posted by Craigdumass
                  There is a problem with the way the wire harness is wired you should call your technical representive because I am not sure if you have to order a new harness or just have to reroute the existing one.
                  There should be a (European) tech bulletin, 2FB-0095 (8619) about the harness but I can't find it. Does anyone have this bulletin?

                    Comment

                    • blackcat4866
                      Master Of The Obvious

                      Site Contributor
                      10,000+ Posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 22989
                      #6
                      8619/2FB-0095

                      I think this is what you want:
                      Attached Files
                      If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
                      1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
                      2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
                      3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
                      4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
                      5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

                      blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

                        Comment

                        • blackcat4866
                          Master Of The Obvious

                          Site Contributor
                          10,000+ Posts
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 22989
                          #7
                          7393/ 2FB-0024

                          Also take a gander at this one:
                          Attached Files
                          If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
                          1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
                          2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
                          3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
                          4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
                          5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

                          blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

                            Comment

                            • B0265
                              Senior Tech

                              500+ Posts
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 718
                              #8
                              Originally posted by blackcat4866
                              I think this is what you want:
                              That's the one, thank you.

                                Comment

                                • aabarnes1
                                  Senior Tech
                                  • Mar 2009
                                  • 620
                                  #9
                                  Sorry I took so long to reply to this, since original post I have had two further instances of this code. The first machine was indeed noise from the transfer unit and once mod was done she worked perfectly. The second was a case of re routing the laser harness and the third was solved with a ferrite core. Now my only problem is the jam code 60! yes I've seen the TB and applied the procedure-even fitted new mylars and feed/sep rollers from next gen machines but still I'm dogged by regular misfeeds in the branch section.
                                  Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.

                                    Comment

                                    • blackcat4866
                                      Master Of The Obvious

                                      Site Contributor
                                      10,000+ Posts
                                      • Jul 2007
                                      • 22989
                                      #10
                                      How many prints on the duplex switchback roller? It should be a PM part since most don't last more than 550K. You'll see J60, J61, J62, or J63. There is a simple test, and a more accurate test.


                                      The simple test: lay your 6" metric scale centered in the same direction as the shaft, on top of the roller. If the end of the ruler touches the lower guide at the rear, the roller is too worn.

                                      Accurate test: Cut a strip of paper ~5mm wide and 100mm long. Wrap it around the rear part of the roller and mark the paper across both layers. Measure the distance between the marks. 64.0mm is worn out. Original circumference was ~ 65.3mm. =^..^=
                                      If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
                                      1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
                                      2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
                                      3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
                                      4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
                                      5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

                                      blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

                                        Comment

                                        • aabarnes1
                                          Senior Tech
                                          • Mar 2009
                                          • 620
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by blackcat4866
                                          How many prints on the duplex switchback roller? It should be a PM part since most don't last more than 550K. You'll see J60, J61, J62, or J63. There is a simple test, and a more accurate test.


                                          The simple test: lay your 6" metric scale centered in the same direction as the shaft, on top of the roller. If the end of the ruler touches the lower guide at the rear, the roller is too worn.

                                          Accurate test: Cut a strip of paper ~5mm wide and 100mm long. Wrap it around the rear part of the roller and mark the paper across both layers. Measure the distance between the marks. 64.0mm is worn out. Original circumference was ~ 65.3mm. =^..^=
                                          I'll post back soon.
                                          Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.

                                            Comment

                                            Previous template Next
                                            Working...