-
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
No worries it's coming
Chris said he was very concerned about whether this
19 represented a national security threat and said he
20 wanted to -- he said he thought we were obligated
21 to tell someone in government, in our government
22 about this information. He thought from his
23 perspective there was an issue -- a security issue
24 about whether a presidential candidate was being
25 blackmailed. From my perspective there was a law
1 enforcement issue about whether there was an
2 illegal conspiracy to violate the campaign laws,
3 and then somewhere in this time the whole issue of
4 hacking has also surfaced.
Last edited by bsm2; 01-10-2018, 02:10 AM.Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
The level of bias and hypocrisy required to hate DJT and overlook the losing candidates corruption is appauling. I still don't get why a Canadian is stirring up such a stink on an industry site. DJT is making the USA great and strong again. BHO sold us out to the world and you haters never complained about it then. Your candidate lost because she was not supported by the smart Americans. When you get to vote in our elections you can complain about the results. Until then, suck it up and be respectful that the people of the USA have spoken. The DNC hack, or phishing attack, simply proved their Russian collusion, to cover that up they accuse their opponent of what they had already done. The DNC is a corrupt organization and you are very naive to continue to believe in them.Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
The naive one is the person who believes one politician cares for them more than another. All politicians care the exact same amount, which is zero.
The only care they have is making their rich peers richer. Nicely proven by recent changes to the US tax system. However, in this case the one making the changes is also going to benefit greatly. Corruption at it finest.
PS. Yes, this an industry site, but this specific thread location is for anything.Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
Enjoy the Fusion GPS transcript
Q. And when you say it was obvious that there
15 was a crime in progress, what specifically are you
16 referencing?
17 A. Espionage. They were hacking into the
18 computers of Democrats and think tanks. That's a
19 computer crime.
20 Q. So the thing that was apparent was Russia
21 or somebody had engaged in cyber intrusion and
22 computer crimes?
Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
I don't believe any politician cares about anything other than obtaining money and power. Fortunately, our president is not a politician... which is why his supporters support him. And it's why I'd take his word over anyone else's in Washington. Certainly over Crooked Hilary's.Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
GTN is a global website that invites comments from all over the world. US citizens might elect to accept commentary from outside their comfort zones to appreciate how the rest of the world perceives the USA.
In many ways, President Trump with his nationalist America first policies degrades the perception of the USA. His moves threatens some countries like Canada and Mexico while emboldening other countries like China and Russia to move into spaces from which the USA seems to be retreating.
All commentators on this thread should remember that it was created for amusement and interesting, polite banter.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
It's coming SOON only preview, That's what the FBI is doing NOW. Like I have access to classified government information. Still waiting for the release transcript of M Flynn with the Russian Ambassador you know the one he lied to the FBI about and plead guilty. Most likely the public will never see the REAL Proof as it would reveal to much about how we get the information from the Russians as to just how good we are at counterintelligence.
Don't think I would call testimony to Congress no proof or evidence
Section 1001 makes it a crime to make any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation in the course of a congressional
investigation. That statute applies to your
statements in this interview.
Witnesses who knowingly provide
false statements could be subject to criminal
prosecution and imprisonment for up to five years.
PS the link is to the entire Fusion GPS transcript full read
Comment
-
Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email
Saying trump isn't a politician is like saying a duck isn't a bird. He is in politics, so he is a politician. So far he has taken healthcare away from the most vulnerable and given permanent tax breaks to his rich peers. That makes him a politician!Comment
Comment