How Russia hacked the Democrats email

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

Mueller was restricted by DOJ policy on indictment of President in office. That No longer applies
Good News

COULD MUELLER INDICT TRUMP DESPITE THE EXISTING POLICY?

The Justice Department regulations governing Mueller’s appointment allow him to deviate from department policy in “extraordinary circumstances” with the approval of the U.S. attorney general, the nation’s top law enforcement official. Trump appointee William Barr currently holds that post.
Some legal experts have suggested Mueller could invoke this exception if he has uncovered serious wrongdoing and lacked confidence in the ability of the divided Congress to hold Trump accountable. Some lawyers also have said Mueller is not bound by the 1973 and 2000 memos because he is not a typical employee of the department.

[bsm2]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

COULD MUELLER INDICT TRUMP DESPITE THE EXISTING POLICY?

The Justice Department regulations governing Mueller’s appointment allow him to deviate from department policy in “extraordinary circumstances” with the approval of the U.S. attorney general, the nation’s top law enforcement official. Trump appointee William Barr currently holds that post.
Some legal experts have suggested Mueller could invoke this exception if he has uncovered serious wrongdoing and lacked confidence in the ability of the divided Congress to hold Trump accountable. Some lawyers also have said Mueller is not bound by the 1973 and 2000 memos because he is not a typical employee of the department.

HILARIOUS Bill Barr nice try
So now you want The AH charged with crimes. Fantastic

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

That's interesting, bsm2 considering that Pelosi and the rest of the loony democrats assured everyone that Trump and his kids would be going to prison. And you parroted that narrative. Now you're telling me that was never gonna happen because Trump couldn't be indicted. lol



President Donald Trump can be indicted — and here's the constitutional proof


The U.S. president must be subject to the same laws as every other American citizen.

The question of whether a president can be indicted has sparked increasingly heated debate over special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Reading various legal scholars and pundits, one might conclude the answer is murky. The logic that underpins the Constitution, however, keeps the door wide open for indictment. And we must keep talking about why.
Get-out-of-jail free cards exist in Atlantic City real estate board games, not the U.S. Constitution. Fortunately for Americans, we know what kind of country we live in: one with equality before the law, not immunity for political leaders. The Constitution contains no provision that would preclude the criminal indictment of the president or any other government official. The Fifth Amendment names the only exceptions — and the president is not one.



Respected constitutional scholars, such as Philip Bobbitt, argue that impeachment is effectively the exclusive path to prosecute a president. It is not. Impeachment by Congress is one way to remove a president from office. Indictment and prosecution for a federal felony provide a separate avenue that need not automatically include removal — just as impeachment need not involve violation of a criminal statute.

Indeed, numerous federal officials have held office despite indictment and even conviction. In the Founding Fathers’ generation, for example, Matthew Lyon was re-elected to Congress in 1798 while in prison for criticizing President John Adams, a violation of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
Critics of the idea of indicting a president often point to a 1973 Justice Department memo that found no constitutional bar to indictment but still concluded that, for pragmatic reasons, it would be a bad idea to prosecute a president in federal courts. In particular, it pointed to the unique duties of the modern presidency, the undue burdens it would place on the chief executive’s time and attention and the reputational damage it would do.



Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens was not persuaded, however, when he ruled in the 1997 Clinton v. Jones decision that a president has no immunity from a federal civil suit.
The 25th amendment provides for a temporary or permanent timeout for the president if he is, for example, incapacitated while preoccupied with defending against federal felony charges. The president himself may decide if he is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” If a president were so tied up with legal matters as to require resignation, the Constitution has a provision for succession, starting with the vice president.
The presidency does have unique powers, but no individual president is irreplaceable and Cabinet departments conduct most of their day-to-day work with little reliance on the president’s personal attention. Prosecution of a president does not mean the executive branch grinds to a halt.


In fact, everything we know about the Constitution and the founding of our republic in rebellion from the British monarchy argues the other way. Emphatically so.
The drafters of the Constitution knew very well the evils of legal impunity and wanted a different system of governance — “a government of laws not men,” as the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 proclaimed. The U.S. president is not a king, and equality before the law was the new republic’s founding and abiding first principle.



Relat

[bsm2]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

That's interesting, bsm2 considering that Pelosi and the rest of the loony democrats assured everyone that Trump and his kids would be going to prison. And you parroted that narrative. Now you're telling me that was never gonna happen because Trump couldn't be indicted. lol




The U.S. president must be subject to the same laws as every other American citizen.

The question of whether a president can be indicted has sparked increasingly heated debate over special counsel into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Reading various legal scholars and pundits, one might conclude the answer is murky. The logic that underpins the Constitution, however, keeps the door wide open for indictment. And we must keep talking about why.
Get-out-of-jail free cards exist in Atlantic City real estate board games, not the U.S. Constitution. Fortunately for Americans, we know what kind of country we live in: one with equality before the law, not immunity for political leaders. The Constitution contains no provision that would preclude the criminal indictment of the president or any other government official. The Fifth Amendment names the only exceptions
Respected constitutional scholars, such as Philip Bobbitt, argue that impeachment is effectively the exclusive path

Matthew Lyon was re-elected to Congress in 1798 while in prison for criticizing President John Adams, a violation of the Alien and Sedition Acts.
Critics of the idea of indicting a president often point to a 1973 Justice Department memo
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens was not persuaded, however, when he ruled in the 1997 Clinton v. Jones decision that a president has no immunity from a federal civil suit.
The 25th amendment provides

In fact, everything we know about the Constitution and the founding of our republic in rebellion from the British monarchy argues the other way. Emphatically so.
Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 proclaimed



Relat

Fantastic glad you agree

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

Fantastic glad you agree

Here's what you said in 2017. You're all over the place.


bsm2 - YES FBI , CIA other intelligence agencies from other countries.
Don't watch FOX than you must not watch ABC,NBC,CBS, MSNBC, CNN or any other real news.
You must still believe Mexico paying for the wall.

Keep believing the Orange KING
HA HA HA PRISON TIME for TRUMP


https://www.copytechnet.com/forums/rants-raves-and-everything-else/124299-how-russia-hacked-democrats-email-2.html?124299=#post582592

[bsm2]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

Here's what you said in 2017. You're all over the place.


bsm2 - YES FBI , CIA other intelligence agencies from other countries.
Don't watch FOX than you must not watch ABC,NBC,CBS, MSNBC, CNN or any other real news.
You must still believe Mexico paying for the wall.

Keep believing the Orange KING
HA HA HA PRISON TIME for TRUMP


https://www.copytechnet.com/forums/rants-raves-and-everything-else/124299-how-russia-hacked-democrats-email-2.html?124299=#post582592

Yep pretty constant the AH a crook
Glad you agree

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

Yep pretty constant the AH a crook
Glad you agree

It was 2017 when you said Trump was going to prison. It's 2021. When is Trump going to prison?

[bsm2]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

It was 2017 when you said Trump was going to prison. It's 2021. When is Trump going to prison?

Tick Tock
Glad you agree

[SalesServiceGuy]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

... the last many posts have nothing to do with Russia's many attempts to weaken the US democracy.

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

... the last many posts have nothing to do with Russia's many attempts to weaken the US democracy.

That's probably because Russia has been trying to destroy our democracy for 5 decades. They would try to destroy Canada's democracy but the USA is on a different level from you guys.

[bsm2]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

That's probably because Russia has been trying to destroy our democracy for 5 decades. They would try to destroy Canada's democracy but the USA is on a different level from you guys.

Funny now you don't love Russia

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

Funny now you don't love Russia

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

How stupid is Obama?


He told Romney that Russia wasn 't a threat and then he told us that Al Queda wasn a JV squad.

[bsm2]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

How stupid is Obama?


He told Romney that Russia wasn 't a threat and then he told us that Al Queda wasn a JV squad.

Funny how You supporters Suck Up to The Russian Puppet

No worries Russia's in for a big surprise in few months

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: How Russia hacked the Democrats email

quipped
in keeping decision
increasing the budget for U.S. support. Nevertheless, the president resisted calls from Congress, foreign policy experts, and his own cabinet to provide lethal weapons to Ukraine that would have raised the costs on Russia and helped Kyiv defend itself against Russian military incursion into the Donbas. As Obama toldThis timid realpolitik was mixed up with a healthy dose of disdain. Obama dismissedbelonged in the 19th century