-
-
Re: Latest on the Corona Virus
Again, you have been lied to by the liberal media that you blindly follow.
From Fauci's NIH website:
Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin. Evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%).
Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths were observed using ivermectin.
Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
The findings indicate with moderate certainty that ivermectin treatment in COVID-19 provides a significant survival benefit.
There is also evidence emerging from countries where ivermectin has been implemented. For example, Peru had a very high death toll from COVID-19 early on in the pandemic.128 Based on observational evidence, the Peruvian government approved ivermectin for use against COVID-19 in May 2020.128 After implementation, death rates in 8 states were reduced between 64% and 91% over a two-month period.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/ - NIH website
So, Who's wrong? The NIH (Fauci's Place) who has reviewed and compiled all the worlds studies on ivermectin, or the dying liberal media (and by association YOU)?Last edited by FrohnB; 11-17-2021, 10:13 PM.OmertÃComment
-
Re: Latest on the Corona Virus
NOPE
Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 | FDA
GAME OVERComment
-
Re: Latest on the Corona Virus
Coronavirus spreads in deer and other animals. Scientists worry about what that means for people
Scientists have found SARS-CoV-2 spreads like a virus among white-tailed deer and other wild animals in the United States.
People are the likely source, but that doesn't mean the virus can't evolve among these animals and then spill back into humans, and researchers are worried about what this spread means for the risk of future pandemics.
There's little doubt SARS-Cov-2, the virus that caused the ongoing pandemic, came from an animal -- almost certainly a bat. And the prevailing scientific opinion is that there as an intermediate host, an animal of some sort, that was infected by a bat or bats and then infected people.
Sewage has been found to carry the virus, so polluted water might be a source, he added, or people spitting or contaminating the environment in other ways.
There are several reasons scientists do not want to see a virus like the one that causes Covid-19 infecting animals. For one, it creates what's known as a reservoir -- so that even in the unlikely case that everyone got vaccinated and the virus stopped circulating among people, it would still circulate among animals and could re-infect people eventually.
More likely however, is the risk that it could change and evolve.
That can happen in two ways.
One is steady adaptation. As it infects different species, the virus will change to better adapt to those species and that could make it either more or less dangerous to humans.
Another route to change: viruses can take shortcuts by swapping big chunks of genetic material in a process called recombination.
Influenza is especially good at this, but coronaviruses can do it, as well. If an animal is infected with more than one coronavirus at a time, the two types can mix and match genes and potentially come up with new variants.
"Recombination is one of the major mechanisms for coronavirus evolution," Ip said. So if animals are already carrying their own varieties of coronavirus, and people are then infecting them with strains that cause pandemics among humans -- the potential exists for these viruses to infect animals at the same time, trade genetic material, and give rise to new pandemic viral species.
People need to remember that humans are the primary source of the spread of the virus. Even if Covid-19 originally came from animals, humans are the species that have amplified and spread it.
And there's one answer to that spread. "Vaccination rates are not uniform across the world," Kuchipudi said. "As long as there are susceptible human beings, we give opportunities for the virus to circulate and change.
There need to be more concerted efforts to vaccinate as many people as possible so that we can at least minimize transmission among human beings."
Comment
-
Re: Latest on the Corona Virus
It's sounding more and more like the vaccine will last mere months and we'll need to keep getting jabbed over and over again. I'm not down with that.Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Latest on the Corona Virus
Content current as of:
09/03/2021
3 months and 14 days ago. Totally out of date.
It does show that at that time clinical trials assessing Ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing. Many of those clinical trials have been completed and did find that Ivermectin is effective. Had the idiot clicked on the Clinical trials link in the report he posted and looked at the results he might have saved himself some embarrassment. But what the hey, we enjoy it when he makes a fool of himself.
Search of: ivermectin | COVID-19 - List Results - ClinicalTrials.govComment
-
Re: Latest on the Corona Virus
But they told us the 'shot' was 94% effective.. and they failed to note that was only for 6 months.
Now the efficacy for the shot(s) is really between 38 - 45% effective.
Sent from my SM-G960U using TapatalkComment
Comment