What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

[bsm2]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

He's a proven loser': Paul Ryan on Trump's future in the Republican Party

[bsm2]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

[BBM]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

I'm truly sorry you are so threatened by this. Change is difficult, I get it. However, change is inevitable. Without change there would be no progress

Change is not always good for the better .

[davidmtupper]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

So what?? Why do you care SO deeply for this. How has your life changed with the removal of or creation of a name?

BTW. "Latinx is used generally as a gender-neutral term for Latin Americans, but it has been especially embraced by members of Latin LGBTQ communities as a word to identify themselves as people of Latin descent possessing a gender identity outside the male/female binary."

These people care about how they are addressed or identified. It has absolutely nothing to do with you. Unless of course you are of Latin American decent.

Identifying people the way they would like to be identified take zero effort.

Identifying them as they are, rather than as they pretend to be, also takes zero effort and is much more honest, honesty being something that is in short supply these days.

[slimslob]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

I feel so much better knowing that Biden hid our national secrets in his garage beside his corvette. I'm starting to believe that the powers that be in the democrat party are trying to get rid of Biden. He's 80-years old, white and male. He no longer fits the profile that democrats desire. I think Joe is in big trouble.

Early on in the campaign for the 2020 Democrat nomination, most younger Democrat voters were saying that they did not want an old white man as candidate. Somehow all the others got forced out of the running. Maybe the money of another old white man.

[slimslob]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

I'm truly sorry you are so threatened by this. Change is difficult, I get it. However, change is inevitable. Without change there would be no progress

You prove that statement wrong almost time you post something. It is far better for there to be no progress than to have progress in the wrong direction.

[Copier Addict]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

You prove that statement wrong almost time you post something. It is far better for there to be no progress than to have progress in the wrong direction.

And who gets to decide which direction is wrong? You? Lol
You prove your inability to deal with reality every day. I sure don't want you deciding which direction to go.

[bsm2]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

Early on in the campaign for the 2020 Democrat nomination, most younger Democrat voters were saying that they did not want an old white man as candidate. Somehow all the others got forced out of the running. Maybe the money of another old white man.

Yep America voted that old Orange Man Out and elected JOE Biden

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

Identifying them as they are, rather than as they pretend to be, also takes zero effort and is much more honest, honesty being something that is in short supply these days.

copier addict isn't being forthcoming with you. He has said that a trans-woman is a real woman and that men should have sex with them or they're a homophobe. But just because he said he'd have sex with one doesn't mean I have to.

[BillyCarpenter]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

And who gets to decide which direction is wrong? You? Lol
You prove your inability to deal with reality every day. I sure don't want you deciding which direction to go.

You like change, do ya? Roe v. Wade was struck down. How you like dem apples? That's change that you can believe in. Chump.

[slimslob]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

And who gets to decide which direction is wrong? You? Lol
You prove your inability to deal with reality every day. I sure don't want you deciding which direction to go.

What I have noticed over the last 60 to 70 years is the the Democrat Party generally does the wrong thing and takes the government in the wrong direction.

Every time that the Democrats have raised taxes "on the rich," the buying power of those who are not rich has been decreased by those taxes.

[davidmtupper]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

And who gets to decide which direction is wrong? You? Lol
You prove your inability to deal with reality every day. I sure don't want you deciding which direction to go.

Your way would have useless, sometimes harmful, changes forced on everyone, just because you think that any "progress" is good. An example would be the left trying to rename pedophiles as "minor attracted persons" to make them seem less harmful. Or redefining the term "recession" because the original meaning hurts the left politically. Not all change is good, some is patently harmful and should not happen.

[Copier Addict]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

Your way would have useless, sometimes harmful, changes forced on everyone, just because you think that any "progress" is good. An example would be the left trying to rename pedophiles as "minor attracted persons" to make them seem less harmful. Or redefining the term "recession" because the original meaning hurts the left politically. Not all change is good, some is patently harmful and should not happen.

Why are you calling it my way? And I have never claimed that any progress is good progress. All I'm saying is it doesn't harm anyone by calling someone "latinx". You have brought up the other garbage. I know I said you can't have progress without change but, that's not the same as any progress is good

[slimslob]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

Why are you calling it my way? And I have never claimed that any progress is good progress. All I'm saying is it doesn't harm anyone by calling someone "latinx". You have brought up the other garbage. I know I said you can't have progress without change but, that's not the same as any progress is good

Most change is not good either.

[Copier Addict]

Re: What republican politicians are actually concerned about. And it ain't people.

Most change is not good either.

Only for old angry men yelling at kids to get off their lawn. You know, the ones who spend way too much time on the internet going down rabbit holes of conspiracies.