Better than I had hoped.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blackcat4866
    Master Of The Obvious

    Site Contributor
    10,000+ Posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 22997

    #16
    Re: Better than I had hoped.

    IIRC, the particle size was crucial. When I had to substitute developer I would choose a model that was from the same time period (same particle size), then measure up the same gram weight. The example I remember that was very successful was Sharp Cougar (AR-M507) developer in a Sharp Dragon (AR-M700N). It actually made better copies than the right stuff.

    Initially I had filled some toner cartridges with the Cougar toner. Somehow the supply department got left out of the information loop and shipped them Dragon toner, which worked fine too. =^..^=
    If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
    1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
    2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
    3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
    4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
    5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

    blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

    Comment

    Working...