Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
Collapse
X
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
Ok, I will check both developer unit and the erase lamp of the Yellow.Comment
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
As for erase leds(lamp) you can trick the machine with front door open and WTB removed and whatch for it.A tree is known by its fruit, a man by his deeds. A good deed is never lost, he who sows courtesy, reaps friendship, and he who plants kindness gathers love.
Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
I am using Konica Minolta Bizhub C45. The Machine works correctly until recently the yellow keep repeat image. I have tried the Transfer Belt in other machine and it works fine. When I swapped Yellow and Cyan Drum Units, the yellow Image still keep repeating itself whiles the Yellow Drum Unit Prints correctly at the Cyan Slot.
Attached is a copy of an envelope printed by the printer.
if you change the drum unit Y to the C and the fault remains in the Y. Just change the development unit Y. or developer And that has to solve your problem
thanks
Comment
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
That's a great question. And there are a lot of answers:
1) Underuse: If you're running 95% monochrome/5% color, the color developers are just sitting there unstirred for long periods of time. The toner settles out of the developer mix. When you do decide to make a color print, it takes a while to get the developer particles charged back up and all the toner stirred back in. During that process, the machine is adding more toner.
2) Generic toner: Electrically, generic toner does not always respond exactly the same as genuine toner. So when the correct amount of generic toner is mixed into the developer, it doesn't always respond to the toner sensor the same way, so it just keeps adding toner to try to get the toner sensor up to 6%.
3) Contamination: Basically the same effect as generic toner. Endusers that use a very poor quality of paper (very high dust content), or in an environment that has a very high level of airborne contamination (like a grindstone manufacturing plant or an iron foundry), that airborne contamination ends up in the developing unit. And if that contamination has magnetic or electrical properties it changes the way the toner sensor reads. Paper dust does not have magnetic or electrical properties, but displaces toner, and leaves light areas (paper dust won't make up a visible latent image).
4) Developer is worn out: When the manufacturer calculates the developer yield it's based on ~4% image fill of each color, and so many color pages. If your color pages are, say 20%, you'll make 1/5th the number of pages. You probably do not know the exact image fill of every color page that you've printed.
In the end though this is all just interesting conversation. Knowing it does not change the need to order a yellow developing unit. =^..^=If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.
blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=Comment
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
That's a great question. And there are a lot of answers:
1) Underuse: If you're running 95% monochrome/5% color, the color developers are just sitting there unstirred for long periods of time. The toner settles out of the developer mix. When you do decide to make a color print, it takes a while to get the developer particles charged back up and all the toner stirred back in. During that process, the machine is adding more toner.
2) Generic toner: Electrically, generic toner does not always respond exactly the same as genuine toner. So when the correct amount of generic toner is mixed into the developer, it doesn't always respond to the toner sensor the same way, so it just keeps adding toner to try to get the toner sensor up to 6%.
3) Contamination: Basically the same effect as generic toner. Endusers that use a very poor quality of paper (very high dust content), or in an environment that has a very high level of airborne contamination (like a grindstone manufacturing plant or an iron foundry), that airborne contamination ends up in the developing unit. And if that contamination has magnetic or electrical properties it changes the way the toner sensor reads. Paper dust does not have magnetic or electrical properties, but displaces toner, and leaves light areas (paper dust won't make up a visible latent image).
4) Developer is worn out: When the manufacturer calculates the developer yield it's based on ~4% image fill of each color, and so many color pages. If your color pages are, say 20%, you'll make 1/5th the number of pages. You probably do not know the exact image fill of every color page that you've printed.
In the end though this is all just interesting conversation. Knowing it does not change the need to order a yellow developing unit. =^..^=
That's a very detailed explanation. I enjoyed reading it.Adversity temporarily visits a strong man but stays with the weak for a lifetime.Comment
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
I had a very similar issue on a C658 recently. I diagnosed it by swapping drums first, then testing the developer, then swapping the erasure lamp between the color affected(in my case cyan) and another color. None of those things took care of it, so I replaced the FRB board. Apparently the connector wasn't powering the erasure lamp for cyan because that fixed it.
edit:
Just realized that this was a thread from a couple years ago. I'll leave my reply in case it's helpful for someone down the road.Comment
-
Re: Bizhub c454 repeat yellow image
And I just had it these days. Also with yellow. Resetting the yellow DevUnit cured it for the moment until I make a fresh unit next week.
Reread Cat's explanation and am impressed once again....., as always......
Hans“Sent from my Intel 80286 using MS-DOS 2.0”
Comment
Comment