Bizhub 4422

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • davidmay
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2024
    • 9

    #1

    Bizhub 4422

    Customer says it prints fine but copies(off glass & doc feeder) are extremely light. They can manually darken it up but it’s still light. Also the scans to desktop are fine.
    I haven’t been there yet. I’ve been out of the field for about 3 years but still have some customers who call me.
    Any suggestions ?
    Thanks,
    Dave
  • copyman
    Owner / Technician

    Site Contributor
    2,500+ Posts
    • Sep 2005
    • 4591

    #2
    Not familiar with that model but I would start by cleaning the optics including the CCD lens.

    Comment

    • Toxic
      Senior Tech

      500+ Posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 696

      #3
      Check imaging unit life.
      If under 50% propably that is problem, seen that many times on 4052.

      Comment

      • davidmay
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2024
        • 9

        #4
        Wouldn’t bad imaging unit not affect the print also ?

        Comment

        • Dianon
          Technician
          • Apr 2025
          • 16

          #5
          This model is a labeld Lexmark A4 MFP, Maybe you want to look in the Lexmark forum as well.

          If i remember correct it is called MX622 (consumer line) or XM3250 (business line) on the lexmark side.

          Comment

          • AlaskaCopyTech
            Technician

            50+ Posts
            • Jan 2024
            • 69

            #6
            I had a really stupid solution to this issue awhile back. If you change the original settings, sometimes, the copier will print just fine on a particular original setting in copy mode.

            Comment

            • Dianon
              Technician
              • Apr 2025
              • 16

              #7
              Originally posted by AlaskaCopyTech
              I had a really stupid solution to this issue awhile back. If you change the original settings, sometimes, the copier will print just fine on a particular original setting in copy mode.
              Thats what my colleague also tells me he often do in this case.
              Not my kind of approch, but if it works.

              Comment

              • Toxic
                Senior Tech

                500+ Posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 696

                #8
                Originally posted by davidmay
                Wouldn’t bad imaging unit not affect the print also ?
                I was thinking the same first time but for some weird reason when IU is weak print still does not show obvious problem, only copy jobs.

                Comment

                • blackcat4866
                  Master Of The Obvious

                  Site Contributor
                  10,000+ Posts
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 22985

                  #9
                  I have found that on Lexmark products the original settings choice is very effective in improving image quality for specific situations.

                  Here's an example: We had Konica Minolta rebadged Lexmark placed at a discount car insurance provider. To qualify for a policy, the agent would copy the insured's drivers license, then scan the copy to an application. When it was set to "Text" original type the copy was mostly black. After scanning that bad copy, the license image was a solid black rectangle, completely illegible. We did two things to improve that image. 1) We set the original type to "Photo". 2) Rather than making a copy, the agent scanned the license image directly to the application. It was a HUGE improvement.

                  Here's another example: My customer was copying originals that had been printed on a crappy inkjet printer. The individual image pixels were clearly visible, and very light. With original settings at "Text/Photo" the resulting copy was illegible. With the original setting at "Text" and a change in the background setting, the resulting copy came out better than the original.

                  I guess that I'm saying that I have no problem with this sort of solution.
                  If you'd like a serious answer to your request:
                  1) demonstrate that you've read the manual
                  2) demonstrate that you made some attempt to fix it.
                  3) if you're going to ask about jams include the jam code.
                  4) if you're going to ask about an error code include the error code.
                  5) You are the person onsite. Only you can make observations.

                  blackcat: Master Of The Obvious =^..^=

                  Comment

                  Working...