[Misc] Katun AR-M350N and AR-M355N Toner

[TennWalker]

Hello All,

We primarily use Sharp OEM toner at our dealership, except for the small AR-157e and AR-207 segment machines. What have been your experiences, if any, regarding the Katun AR-M350 and AR-M355 cartridges? Our Katun rep continues to suggest trying these cartridges. We only use Sharp OEM drums and developer because of the performance and longevity they offer vs. generics.

Thanks in advance for your suggestions.

[Silvertoast]

we use the katun toners for the 350-355 ect.. along with others no problems

[jpcopy]

we have tried katun and several others in the imagistics 3510/3511 (by changing chip and mod drum unit) and after 3 to 500 copies we got backgrounding. so we just stick with sharp and imagistics toner. might be able to adjust out but we figured it would give up problems down the road so why bother. always seem we get stated yield or better for oem.

[costd]

We only use Sharp OEM drums and developer because of the performance and longevity they offer vs. generics.

IMO, same for toner. Our experience has been oem for all consumables. Sort of the old Fram commercial - pay me now or pay me more later.

[tmaged]

OEM for 350-450 because of background issues. Katun for 355-455 without any problems.

[DINGO]

hi
it's just my experience, i use toner, and drum katun, and developer oem in a lot of ar-m450/350, many years,
and have had no problems.