Hi All,
I know its a bit late to post this problem as i believe a newer model maybe on its way, however just wondering if anyone has MPC4000 & 5000s that have paper wrap around the heat rollers in the fuser when the print consists of a leading edge of solid colour.
the scenario is that the paper source must be A4/Letter in Portrait orientation. The solid colour on the leading edge doesnt have to be running from top to bottom as long as it runs for about 1/2 the height of the page, it will wrap, even if the solid bar is only 5mm wide.
We have gotten around this by making the default tray for printing and copying as Tray 2, with paper in landscape orientation.
Ricoh HQ hasnt given any useful advice other than:
*Its only us that have this problem (which we know we arent cause other Ricoh techies we speak to tell us the same thing
*shift the print edge over more to the right - no good to us as the image is off centre and we do not like the customer abusing us for doing this.
So what are you're solutions/work arounds for this problem if you have come across it. thanks.
regards
Steve
I know its a bit late to post this problem as i believe a newer model maybe on its way, however just wondering if anyone has MPC4000 & 5000s that have paper wrap around the heat rollers in the fuser when the print consists of a leading edge of solid colour.
the scenario is that the paper source must be A4/Letter in Portrait orientation. The solid colour on the leading edge doesnt have to be running from top to bottom as long as it runs for about 1/2 the height of the page, it will wrap, even if the solid bar is only 5mm wide.
We have gotten around this by making the default tray for printing and copying as Tray 2, with paper in landscape orientation.
Ricoh HQ hasnt given any useful advice other than:
*Its only us that have this problem (which we know we arent cause other Ricoh techies we speak to tell us the same thing
*shift the print edge over more to the right - no good to us as the image is off centre and we do not like the customer abusing us for doing this.
So what are you're solutions/work arounds for this problem if you have come across it. thanks.
regards
Steve
Comment