Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ExXeroid
    replied
    I was trained on 1065 family and the 5046 which used a smaller version of that fuser. Fuser agent was stored in a bottle and circulated by AIR PRESSURE. In other words a puddle on the floor which turned said floor into an Ice Skating Ring. (Pump was introduced later, much to late)

    Leave a comment:


  • ExXeroid
    replied
    Only thing I know about the Igen is the toner cartridges are freaking HUGE. I left X in 05, when they were doing all the cutting. I couldn't take it anymore.

    Leave a comment:


  • ExXeroid
    replied
    Not really all X had the 1090 that wasn't digital that was 90 PPM. 5046 was 35 PPM. They were noisy as all hell.

    Leave a comment:


  • kingpd@businessprints.net
    replied
    Originally posted by ExXeroid
    Anything that used fuser lube, fuser oil or fuser agent. The old analog machine. Clamshells were bad but they didn't have the staplers or sorters we had on some mid volume over at X. X 5046 was the most unreliable and poorly designed machine I ever work on.
    I just literally less than an hour ago watched a video on the Igen 4 and I swear they had a bottle of fuser oil under the fuser...apparently they're still using it on toner systems.

    Leave a comment:


  • kingpd@businessprints.net
    replied
    Originally posted by Penvy
    Come on guys,
    as far as expense, time wasted, lack of field tech support, overall design,customer complaints,failure rates,
    bad servers (T1)
    AND they knew this before releasing the product
    (what i am saying here is with all their experience on this business the still let this one out)

    Canon C1
    Aren't they really really slow too?

    Leave a comment:


  • ExXeroid
    replied
    Worse Copiers ever

    Anything that used fuser lube, fuser oil or fuser agent. The old analog machine. Clamshells were bad but they didn't have the staplers or sorters we had on some mid volume over at X. X 5046 was the most unreliable and poorly designed machine I ever work on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Penvy
    replied
    Come on guys,
    as far as expense, time wasted, lack of field tech support, overall design,customer complaints,failure rates,
    bad servers (T1)
    AND they knew this before releasing the product
    (what i am saying here is with all their experience on this business the still let this one out)

    Canon C1

    Leave a comment:


  • Copier Doc
    replied
    Worst for me were the copyprinters of the 1980's 1040 & the like.
    Happy memories of changing ink screens & end up looking like a coal miner!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • slybot
    replied
    Originally posted by slybot
    the T/A 512RE was pretty well up there years ago, but nowadays dont get me started. the brand starts with x by memory and all of them
    woops i stuffed up. the T/A was actually the T/A 215 which was the mita 512 (i think, we are talking close to 20 years ago and the memory aint that good) but agreed gerrard.fletcher, they were a daily nightmare

    Leave a comment:


  • Proton
    replied
    Originally posted by Aneurysm
    Since this was my favorite queston posted, I will bring it up again,
    Which copier was the biggest peice of crap ever? :evil:
    in my case is CS-PRO 5000 or some people known them as EP-5000
    that machine is a living hell!
    i spend more than half the price of the machine to buy new parts almost every month
    but still.... a very heavy burden to make it run smooth...

    Leave a comment:


  • slybot
    replied
    Which copier was the biggest peice of crap ever

    the T/A 512RE was pretty well up there years ago, but nowadays dont get me started. the brand starts with x by memory and all of them

    Leave a comment:


  • gerrard.fletcher
    Guest replied
    Worst copier

    Originally posted by Aneurysm
    Since this was my favorite queston posted, I will bring it up again,
    Which copier was the biggest peice of crap ever? :evil:
    The Mita 513 was a daily nightmare. You wouldn't expect that standard from any decent brand!

    Leave a comment:


  • Stirton.M
    replied
    I would have to say the Konica Minolta C10....what an utter piece of crap....just to replace the fuser, you have to take most of it apart...I mean panels, scanner unit off, a couple boards to get at a harness for that scanner, a second board to get at the plugin for the fuser AC, but not before removing a whole lotta other stuff just to get at that insignificant part....

    I used to think highly of KM hardware...but this POS monstrocity...WTF were they thinking when they released this garbage to the end user?

    Leave a comment:


  • fallguy
    replied
    The Xerox 1050 comes to mind,anyone ever had to re-wired the optics and or the legal 2nd tray within the machine?
    A pain it truly was.

    Leave a comment:


  • jma676
    replied
    Originally posted by kingpd@businessprints.net
    lmfao...you should burn a copy and send it to xante.

    Well, I have nothing to say against Xante! my only intention was to show the curious case!!
    So as described in this thread.

    These guys were determined to show what they seemed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...