Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CompyTech
    replied
    Re: Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

    I'm fairly new to this game an haven't worked on too many, so the worst machine I think I have seen as far as being a cheap POS is the KonicaMinolta bizhub181 and the C10. Also had some fun adventures with the C252 and bizhub 500.

    Leave a comment:


  • wmi-steve
    Guest replied
    Re: Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

    I know I am aging myself....but I seem to recall back in the 'Old liquid' copier days of SAVIN's.... there was a conversion kit process that we could install on any liquid SAVIN copier a customer had that would allow the liquid SAVIN to be able to produce a nice rich , dark black solid fill copy like the NEW 'powder' copiers.....this NEW technololgy was called the "LANDA Process' which dealers were encouraged to sell by the hundreds. After we installed many, many of these conversion kits we started having problems with heater plate thermal meltdowns and some copiers actually catching on fire! It got so bad that a group of independent SAVIN dealers got together and had a Class action lawsuit against SAVIN and won. So there is a trip down memory lane for some of you younger techs.

    Leave a comment:


  • mushy
    replied
    Re: Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

    Based on the number of tech bulletins (a 3 in. binder full) it had to be the Konica 4003, then they had a lct that was unbelievable

    Leave a comment:


  • ExXeroid
    replied
    Re: Which copier was the biggest peice of crap ever?

    Any Copier with RMFD (ReManufactured) next to the Serial # Example Xerox 1065.
    Any Tech will tell you it stands for Ruin My F**king Day
    Last edited by ExXeroid; 07-15-2011, 01:37 PM. Reason: spelling

    Leave a comment:


  • excanonguy
    replied
    Re: Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

    Originally posted by Toner Boy
    We all hate what we don't know, personally its Toshiba, does the software end of it ever go right?
    Not that I have seen lol!

    Leave a comment:


  • Toner Boy
    replied
    Re: Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

    Originally posted by vincent64
    Now I like the old SD Sharps, 2060's,2260, they were alright, the 3062 with that finisher was a beast though, and the RDH, argh, but over all not bad machine, now the old SF 7800 bunch, now them were some POS.
    But I have quickly learned, any mach you dont know too well gets to stinking real fast, even faster when you never seen it, and trying to figure out just how to get into it.
    We all hate what we don't know, personally its Toshiba, does the software end of it ever go right?

    Leave a comment:


  • excanonguy
    replied
    Originally posted by BLADE
    someone nominated the canon np3725 in an earlier thread. From memory the np3725 was an upgraded np3525. Let me list common faults for the np3525.....aluminium pressure roller bearings would colapse, corona end blocks made from wrong type of plastic would burn out, all spring clutches would seize including dev drive, registration, duplex drive, paper feed, web drive gears would colapse, main motor brushes sticking, pale grey copies from bad dev unit design, dev bearings seize, paper lift gears braking, pcu seizes when waste full, control panel buttons fail, oneway bearings fail. All this and more at every service !!! POS
    You have a great memory !! I had forgotten half those problems...the funny thing is the 2015's and 4540's that came out at the same time were just as bad or worse pieces of garbage lol!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tricky
    replied
    Originally posted by scanzmgs
    canon irc3100
    Originally posted by mjunkaged
    I believe the 'FP' in the old Panasonic analogs stood for 'freakin' pile'!!! =oD
    Likewise i believe the IRC3100

    stands for

    Incapable of Running Correctly

    Or

    Inconsistently Reliable Copies

    I may be wrong though...

    Leave a comment:


  • mjunkaged
    replied
    I believe the 'FP' in the old Panasonic analogs stood for 'freakin' pile'!!! =oD

    Leave a comment:


  • scanzmgs
    replied
    canon irc3100

    Leave a comment:


  • kleezz
    Guest replied
    Kleezz

    All analog sharp copiers.

    Leave a comment:


  • BLADE
    replied
    someone nominated the canon np3725 in an earlier thread. From memory the np3725 was an upgraded np3525. Let me list common faults for the np3525.....aluminium pressure roller bearings would colapse, corona end blocks made from wrong type of plastic would burn out, all spring clutches would seize including dev drive, registration, duplex drive, paper feed, web drive gears would colapse, main motor brushes sticking, pale grey copies from bad dev unit design, dev bearings seize, paper lift gears braking, pcu seizes when waste full, control panel buttons fail, oneway bearings fail. All this and more at every service !!! POS

    Leave a comment:


  • vincent64
    replied
    Originally posted by ZOOTECH
    We still have some of those SDs still cranking away at 5-6+ million, and the 3062 RDH along with the 4085 were a nightmare.
    5 and 6 million...wow...where ya'll getting parts from, supplies from Katun I guess, but did not think Sharp still parts for them beasties any more, or ya'll still have some parts machines hidden away

    Leave a comment:


  • lcastillo5
    replied
    Panasonic FP-1530 and FP-2030 If you could fix those P.O.S. without a recall you could probably work on a space shuttle, and god knows those are a P.O.S. too.

    Leave a comment:


  • JVC
    replied
    As far as analog the Minolta 4320 was the worst when it first came out, although a few years later the ones left in my territory were the best machines I had.

    Digital the 3511/4511 had to be the worst. I did get pretty good tearing it apart after a while.

    Leave a comment:

Working...