Which copier was the biggest piece of crap ever?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • techspec
    Trusted Tech

    100+ Posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 128

    #241
    In the Panasonic range has to be the Workio 2500. I thought that was a piece of junk till I came across the Nashuatec DSc224/232 which totally is a bag of spanners!

    Comment

    • Shadow1
      Service Manager

      Site Contributor
      1,000+ Posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 1642

      #242
      I'm assuming that your DSc224 is the same as an AF1224 (product code B051) and I'm not quite up on my Brit, so I'm also assuming a "Bag of Spanners" is not a good thing - and I couldn't agree more.
      73 DE W5SSJ

      Comment

      • digicor
        Service Manager

        1,000+ Posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 1152

        #243
        ANYTHING THAT CLAM SHELLS GET MY VOTE

        Comment

        • Ollie1981
          Toner Monkey

          250+ Posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 418

          #244
          After this past week I'm adding the Ricoh MP4000/MP5000 to this list:-

          Twelve months ago I never thought you could make the NAD based 35/45 cpm engine any worse.

          But they haven't half proved me wrong:-

          The dev and toner has never been particularly great on this family, but this latest version is shocking,even with the Dev/Charge bias changes you are lucky if you get 50k before it overtones itself to death.

          And why oh why did they put an oil web on the fuser? The 3035/3045 didn't have them and didn't particularly suffer for it. More to the point though why did they have to put such a fiddly one on when changing the web in the MP7500 is a five minute job? And why do one in three MP5000 web units have a seized alan screw so you can't get the damn thing apart without taking a hacksaw to it?

          Why did they combine the PCU and Dev unit into a single unit, when all this achieves is making the tech spend another five minutes farting around over what he used to spend on a 3045.

          I wish I could load every single one of these sh*tboxes into a rocket and fire it into the sun.

          Comment

          • garf004

            #245
            1550 Helll

            Originally posted by copi_40
            I am the winner of this contest !!!!!
            The right answer is TOSHIBA 1550
            Yes the lower fame used to bend & the mod was strip off everything & replace it & it still jammed after,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,............???

            Comment

            • Jimbo1
              Senior Tech

              500+ Posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 845

              #246
              It was always a little freaky that it clamshelled from the front!
              "Some days you get the bear, some days the bear gets you."

              Cdr. William Riker

              Comment

              • Travis06
                Tech.

                100+ Posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 193

                #247
                Originally posted by jimbo1
                It was always a little freaky that it clamshelled from the front!
                The first time I saw one, it hit me right in the jaw, when the clamshell opened like the hood of a car. (thought it was like a 1350)

                Comment

                • montana
                  Trusted Tech
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 393

                  #248
                  there is an old minolta models -ep 510 -ep 710 & mita dc1405-mita dc 1855 all analogue &the worst models i ever met.

                  Comment

                  • Shadow1
                    Service Manager

                    Site Contributor
                    1,000+ Posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 1642

                    #249
                    I always hated the Lanier 6450 and 6550 - these were Toshiba machines, although I have no idea what model. The drum and developer came out in a metal tray and weighed about a zillion pounds. A good drum looked like it had been sandblasted, and when they got smooth and shiny like a "good" metallic drum was supposed to look they were bad. (not to mention the selenium, arsenic, and tellurium they were made from is very toxic) Brand new developer and a full pm and the machine would dust. Charge wire liked to arc to the drum.

                    In their defense I will say that teflon was not a required coating on the heat roller - Saw one with over 1M that was completely down to polished aluminum and making perfect copies. They would also run for about a month regardless of how many copies you put on them be it 100 or 100k.
                    73 DE W5SSJ

                    Comment

                    • Jimbo1
                      Senior Tech

                      500+ Posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 845

                      #250
                      I worked on those too. It was like pulling the engine out of a Volkswagen.

                      I also had a fleet of Lanier 6360 machines. Made the 6550 look simple.

                      "Some days you get the bear, some days the bear gets you."

                      Cdr. William Riker

                      Comment

                      • Pantylotion
                        Technician
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 15

                        #251
                        Brother 9420

                        i loathe this printer.

                        Comment

                        • fireater
                          Repair God? not quite

                          250+ Posts
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 253

                          #252
                          sorry guys but Toshiba EStudio 35-4511 is king of crap

                          You guys make me laugh ... nothing is crappier to work on than a 3511 toshiba. Any machine that takes 6 plus hours to do a full pm on it has to be king

                          although they DO have good copy (for office colour)
                          I fix copiers ...Well Sorta

                          Comment

                          • Shadow1
                            Service Manager

                            Site Contributor
                            1,000+ Posts
                            • Sep 2008
                            • 1642

                            #253
                            Originally posted by fireater
                            You guys make me laugh ... nothing is crappier to work on than a 3511 toshiba. Any machine that takes 6 plus hours to do a full pm on it has to be king
                            Is that anything like a FC-22 (which I knew as a Lanier 5722 and then the LC031) All those cheezy plastic pieces inside the drum unit that kept breaking and the "automatic developer dump" that never worked. Wouldn't have been so bad if they designed the drum and dev units to be disposable, but to actually have to rebuild the EPU was as about as fun as smashing my testicles in a clamshell machine (no I didn't, but I did catch my pants leg when a bad shock collapsed - luckily it was running down the other leg...)
                            73 DE W5SSJ

                            Comment

                            • Lagonda
                              Service Manager

                              Site Contributor
                              1,000+ Posts
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 1649

                              #254
                              For my money it was the IBM 2 , rebadged out here as the Nashua 8120, that was the biggest boat anchor I came across. For a start it was built like a Mack truck and you needed a toolbox full of truck spanners to work on them.
                              The electronics were so retro-tec I'm surprised it didn't have vacuum tube valves in there.
                              The fuser was a honey of a design, it slide out on a single rail and split open for servicing with out having to remove it from the copier, but the rest!!!
                              The dev unit weighed half a ton and wasn't on rails and had to be humped and manhandled clear of the frame and usually squashed your fingers. When you refitted the paper feeds units they had to be shimmed back/front, left/right and up/down to get them into the right place. The main motor was a 3 phase job that needed two guys to pick it up.
                              The cleaning station was built into the frame and couldn't be removed. To clean it out you had to pull the front end off and reach in up to your armpit with a scotchbrite pad to get all the lumpy toner out. About as much fun as putting your arm up a camels ar$ehole!!!
                              No wonder IBM almost went broke!!!
                              At least 50% of IT is a solution looking for a problem.

                              Comment

                              • jcottingham

                                #255
                                Let's go back in time some

                                I may be dating myself a bit but do any of you all remeber working on wet toner systems? I had 2 particularly smelly jewels that I have almost had the pleasure of erasing from my head. One was a Pitney-Bowes Desktop? copier amd the other was a Micrographix microfilm Reader/printer. Any repair usually included draining the toner and running and scrubbing the toner system with with toner solvent that was messy an would eat through latex gloves. And nylon strips on the guides would eventualy come off and you had to tear the chassis down to replace them. Heaven help you if a guide warped.

                                Comment

                                Working...